Cloudways vs InterServer (2026): A Tie, Broken by 5.6 Times the Price
Both score 4.1. The tie-break is cost of ownership, and InterServer costs a sixth as much. Cloudways keeps the better evidence.
Head-to-head comparisons between two hosting providers, judged on renewal pricing, independently published speed and uptime figures, support, and ownership. Where the two are close, we say so instead of picking a winner for the sake of it.
Both score 4.1. The tie-break is cost of ownership, and InterServer costs a sixth as much. Cloudways keeps the better evidence.
Hostwinds costs less than half as much and renews at $6.99. Only one of the two has figures anyone has checked.
Rocket.net costs exactly twice as much and blocks the load test. Cloudways has the uptime, the flexibility and no visit cap.
Both hosts dropped requests under load, so uptime decides it: about 21 minutes a year against about 21 hours.
Scala’s shared plan is cheaper at every stage and handled the load test better than Cloudways’ weakest cloud. Cloudways has the flexibility.
Nineteen dollars a month buys dedicated resources, root and a support contract. It does not buy a measured record.
After the dollar year, IONOS and Cloudways cost exactly the same. Only one of them completed the load test.
Namecheap is a registrar with cheap hosting; Cloudways is a server with no domains. You may not have to choose.
Once the promotion ends, the two cost the same to within a cent. The choice is what each one includes.
A2 Hosting is now hosting.com, and its Turbo tier renews at $20.99. From month 25 the managed cloud server is the cheaper buy.